You can download the e-reader friendly version here.
COVID-19: 18th Amendment And The Constitutional Turn
A heavily politicised tussle between federal and provincial authorities over how to respond to COVID-19 has recently been threatening to take a constitutional turn. Arguably the most popular and controversial piece of legislation in Pakistani history, the 18th Amendment has the unique capacity to simultaneously draw on intense emotions, governance hurdles and questions that cut to the very essence of the federal structure. Tabadlab speaks to a diverse panel of experts to weigh in on the sticking points of the debate and how to build a consensus that will last.
Dr. Arfana Mallah is a Professor in Dr. M. A. Kazi institute of Chemistry at the University of Sindh. She is also a Human rights activist and a leader of the Women’s Action Forum.
Rafiullah Kakar is the Director of Planning and Development Department, Government of Balochistan with over five years of experience in policy strategy, and political economy analysis.
Tariq Khosa is the Director at the National Initiative against Organized Crime (NIOC). He has been actively involved in law enforcement for over 3 decades.
Dr. Miftah Ismail is the Former Federal Minister for Finance for Government of Pakistan. He is currently the director of Sui Southern Gas Company.
Salman Akram Raja is an Advocate of the Supreme Court of Pakistan and has around 30 years of vast experience in all forms of dispute resolution.
Timing of Debate
With COVID-19 currently running roughshod over all aspects of public and private life, our panelists question whether this is an appropriate time to launch into a complex debate over the devolution of powers. Will the wrangling further diminish the possibility of a united political response to the current crisis?
Is the leadership of the country genuinely divided over the principle of devolution or does the issue pertain specifically to the limits placed on federal finances? Our speakers delve into the NFC Award, state expenditures and whether the possibility of an amicable agreement exists.
How legitimate is the critique levelled at provinces of lacking the requisite capacity to effectively administer the powers vested in them by the 18th Amendment? Is the best solution to bolster their capabilities to manage their affairs or revert authority to the Centre?
What role does a centrally-recruited civil service play in provincial autonomy? How does the efficacy of the same bureaucracy vary when placed at the Centre as opposed to the federating units? What are the possibilities, prospects and hurdles of certain services being entirely localised?
Are the provinces doing an injustice to the spirit of the 18th Amendment by acquiring powers and funds from the Centre without passing it down to district administrations? What are the historical trends regarding full devolution and how has this impacted service delivery in key areas?
Our speakers make a unanimous case for an increase in testing capacity above all else. A blueprint for stratified sampling and differentiated responses is laid out, while emphasising the need and challenges of identifying asymptomatic patients.
Are debates over the federal structure inevitably tinged with a sense of identity politics? How important is it to avoid hitting nationalistic nerves when discussing issues of governance? What responsibilities does the federation have towards its units and has the historical centralisation of power left much to be desired?
• Strengthening the capacity of provinces to manage their affairs
• Convening Council of Common Interest meetings to discuss issues
• Beginning deliberations over an 8th NFC Award to resolve financial tussles
• Understanding that revenue growth is the only long-term solution
• Recognizing the need for consensus-building in delicate political matters